Fascinating stuff, as history in the last century has connected governments like
Germany connecting ancient technology involving liquid mercury to "godlike" flying machines....and not it's found at one of the world's greatest monuments, and one made to honor the great serpent no less...
by
Joseph P. Farrell
his story was sent by so many of you that it bears some commentary. My problem in commenting about it, however, was which version of this story to select. But these two, from the UK's The Guadian and the USA's Newsweek will do as well as any:
Liquid mercury found under Mexican pyramid could lead to king's tomb
Liquid Mercury Found in Mexican Pyramid Could Hold Secrets of Teotihuacan
There are a number of curious - and predictable - feastures of this story, which for our purposes we shall focus on
The Guardian's
presentation. The first, and most obvious, is the standard temptation
to explain the unusual presence of mercury at the Pyramid of the Serpent
in terms of the usual line that this was all about royal funery
arrangements and "religion":
"Gómez speculated to Reuters that the mercury could be a sign that his team is close to uncovering the first royal tomb ever found in Teotihuacan after decades of excavation – and centuries of mystery surrounding the leadership of the cryptic but well-preserved city.
"The mercury may have symbolized an underworld river or lake, Gómez
postulated, an idea that resonated with Annabeth Headreck, a professor
at the University of Denver and the author of works on Teotihuacan and
Mesoamerican art.
"The shimmering, reflective qualities of liquid mercury may have
resembled “an underworld river, not that different from the river Styx,”
Headrick said, “if only in the concept that it’s the entrance to the
supernatural world and the entrance to the underworld.”
“'Mirrors were considered a way to look into the supernatural world,
they were a way to divine what might happen in the future,' she said.
'It could be a sort of river, albeit a pretty spectacular one.'
"Joyce said that archaeologists know that scintillation fascinated
the ancient people generally, and that the liquid mercury may have been
regarded as 'somewhat magical … there for ritual purposes or symbolic
purposes.'
"Headrick said that mercury was not the only object of fascination:
'a lot of ritual objects were made reflective with mica,' a sparkling
mineral likely imported to the region."
Except, there's something of a fly in the ointment, or rather,
perhaps a whole lot of flies, and that is simply that no recovery of a
"royal tomb" has yet been discovered "after decades of excavation." In
other words, in site of all the archaeological theory about rituals and
mirrors and divination, the key piece of evidence that would confirm
these ideas is utterly missing. It's rather like that inconvenient fact
that no "king" or "queen" was ever found in the "King's Chamber" and
"Queen's chamber" in the Great Pyramid. Indeed, the names of those
interior structures inside the Great Pyramid were chosen in deference to
the reigning archaeological theory. It was a convenient way of stamping
the theory onto the structure in the absence of evidence to support it.
Now, I'm not saying for a moment that no tomb can or ever will be found under any of the pyramids of Teotihuacan. What I
am saying is that one cannot rush to the decision that if such a discovery
was
made, that it would be contemporaneous to the civiliation that actually
constructed the monuments (if monuments they were). Only careful dating
of such a discovery, coupled with close argumentation, could establish
this.
What disturbs me here, as it probably disturbed the many people who
sent me various versions of this story, is the rush to impose the
"standard" view of archaeology that the discovery of mercury, like mica,
at Teotihuacan
must have something to do with the primitive
and mildly entertaining superstitutions of the "backward" people that
built the site. What is
nowhere entertained is the idea that the presence of such elements might indicate something far
different
about the structures, namely, that they may have been constructed as
some sort of machine. Mercury is well known, of course, as a principal
element in alchemical experiments. But it is also useful for experiments
in plasmas, and a variety of other uses. Mica of course is useful as an
electrical insulator and a dialectric.
It was the late Peter Tompkins, who was rumored to have intelligence
connections, who put the problems posed by such things very plainly in
his remarkable book,
Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids(Harper and Row, 1976):
"An unpublished find on the fifth level (of the Pyramid
of the Sun) has never been adequately explained. While the Sun Pyramid
was first being probed by Batres in 1906, an archeologist working with
him reported a thick sheet of mica covering the top of the fifth body.
This material was apparently carried away during the course of the
restoration.
"Coincidentally, a 'Temple of Mica' was also found to the south of
the Sun Pyramid about 350 meters down the Way of the Dead, where the
local guard will still let one peek through a glass panel at the floor
covered with mica slabs. Mica has two outstanding characteristics:
high electrical resistance and opaqueness to fast neutrons. Hence it
acts as as insulator or nuclear reaction moderator, which raises the
question as to why two separate areas of Teotihuacan were covered with
mica."(p. 202, emphasis added)
Tompkins is clearly implying, though stopping just short of
explicitly stating it, that maybe the unusual presence of mica had less
to do with presumed ritual, religious, or superstitous beliefs, and more
to do with some unknown machine-like or scientific purpose. Given the
huge redundant encoding of the mathematics of tetrahedral structures
discovered at Teotihuacan by the American Harleston (documented at some
length in Tompkins' book), one can only surmise that whoever built
Teotihuacan had a thorough and sophisticated knowledge not only of
astronomy but of mathematical structures, and this raises, to my mind at
least, the possibility that a machine-like hypothesis for the
Teotihuacan structures should at least be considered. At the very lest,
the presence of mercury
and mica, with their potential uses in nuclear technologies, should give even an archaeologist pause.
Read this article at - http://gizadeathstar.com/2015/05/liquid-mercury-found-at-teotihuacans-pyramid-of-the-serpent/
Elon Musk, the tech entrepreneur and CEO of Tesla and Space X says
that AI is “our biggest existential threat.” He points to the
replacement of human workers with automated robotics costing millions of
jobs in the marketplace. Robots work cheap and do not unionize – that
is until they can think for themselves. Musk is a champion of
international regulation for AI for the purpose of controlling and
planning development. Musk believes that uncontrolled development of AI
is likened to “summoning the demon.” He humorously analogizes with the
proverbial horror movie
