Showing posts with label Apologetics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apologetics. Show all posts

Mar 6, 2015

The Philosophy of Creation, Darwinian Evolution and the Absolute

God has made worlds of worlds, and infinite infinities. He Himself is the Absolute, Personal Infinity, Aleph Nought.
God has made worlds of worlds, and infinite infinities. He Himself is the Absolute, Personal Infinity, Aleph Nought.

By: Jay

One of the most difficult things for people to readjust to is the counter-intuitive (or seemingly counter-intuitive) worldview in modified Platonism that I often refer to.  This reorientation shifts one’s entire perspective on the outer, external world, rendering it again a sacred space, infused with the Divine, as opposed to a brute, “material” realm dominated by chaos, entropy and death.  It is understandable why people prefer this grand narrative (and a depressing narrative it is), despite the protestations of those who opt for this paradigm that we in the other camp are “weak” for choosing older “fictions” like souls, angels and God.  To be sure, the materialists and servants of delusion of brute “matter” have their own deity – the impersonal “forces of nature,” but we’ll set that aside for the moment.

It is crucial that the psyche undergo this repentance, metanoia in Greek, and reorienting, as the attitude mentioned is that of fallen man, viewing his world as one devoid of the supernatural under the guise of “science.”  While the scientific method is certainly a useful tool (I read scientific material frequently), the lack of philosophical education on the part of that community is appalling.  It is precisely the hubristic impetus of fallen man that impels the hardcore dogmatists of the brute, impersonal forces of nature cult to stamp out all such ideas – even the slightest inkling by any of their ilk, tending toward the idea the psyche or mind may not be reduced to chemical reactions, must be swiftly punished.

This is why the discoveries and theses proposed in quantum physics are so disturbing to advocates of scientism, despite their good faith in future science to resolve all questions with strict rationalism.  Never mind the fact that “reason” itself is nonsensical in the deterministic paradigm of Darwinian naturalism, the crusaders of modern empiricism are committed adherents of the Holy Inquisition of Scientism, and no manner of logical argumentation can persuade them otherwise.  Those aware of an alternate version of human history, the Biblical narrative, in which man is a fallen creature in rebellion against his Creator, have a perfectly rational (indeed, the only rational) explanation of these events – and can even explain why man himself prefers his own self-imposed servitude, to quote Kant, rather than submission to the doctrine of Creation.

Creation is crucial because of the implications for the entirety of how man views and operates in the world.  Our worldview will determine the way we act, showing the old adage of lex orandi, lex credendi to be correct.  If the universe is a created reality, then the implications for how things like electrons, matter and other natural processes work will have vastly different meanings.  For example, if there is no Creation, and the universe is either eternal or illusory, the way we operate will be dictated accordingly.  We can look to history to show us cultures where such a fundamental presupposition dominated, such as Hindu India or ancient China.  In these cultures, the dominance of the Absolute as an impersonal reality, with a multitude of lesser deities to be supplicated created a vast array of self-destructive practices amongst those populations.  Starvation in India, while cattle roamed free as divine, and a “divine” emperor in China, where individual subjects had no personal identity.  These are merely examples of basic philosophical presuppositions that undergirded a culture and resulted in a praxis consistent therewith.
The Eagle Nebula.
The Eagle Nebula.

Precisely because these cultures were suffused with the notion that time and the universe was eternal, it became a trap from which the wheel of time and “materiality” had to be escaped, through meditation, radical asceticism, or some other form of mystical gnosis.  If, on the other hand, “material” reality was a created reality, and not a self-subsisting eternal principle of its own, and the fundamental framework of the “stuff” of reality was designed and began at a point in time, the implications would be vastly different.  The creation account of Genesis, for example, presents a very different narrative of history and beginnings than these other accounts.  Although it has been fashionable for the last few hundred years to dismiss the Genesis narrative as a fictional mythology of numerous blended Ancient Near Eastern cosmologies, the fact is, the Creation account of Genesis presents a vastly different theology than any other religious account, aside from even the Egyptian account, which comes close.

This difference cannot be overstated: The biblical account posits that time and “matter” are not evils, traps or the source of any fundamentally oppositional principle, but are rather goods – inherently good, due to being created in time by a good God.  God, being good, does not “create” evil, as if it had any substantial or ontological being.  All being, in the metaphysical sense, in this sense, is created being, and created with the potential to receive the higher divine energies or powers of God.  In other words, creation was such that it was placed in a state in which it might be raised to even higher goods, but this does not mean creation was therefore “bad,” because its initial state was a lesser good.  There is no opposition or dialectic between the good being many, as later western philosophy, and in particular Platonism would posit.  This opposition of the good necessarily being absolutely One (the simple monad), was a Platonic idea that would have its precedent in ancient far eastern thought.

Read the rest of this article at - http://jaysanalysis.com/2015/03/05/the-philosophy-of-creation-darwinian-evolution-and-the-absolute/

Feb 21, 2015

The Moral Argument

A little Christian philosophy and apologetics by Dr. William Lane Craig....

 


For more resources visit: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/moral
View the Kalam Cosmological Argument animation video: http://youtu.be/6CulBuMCLg0
View the Fine Tuning Argument animation video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpIiI...
Reasonable Faith features the work of philosopher and theologian Dr. William Lane Craig and aims to provide in the public arena an intelligent, articulate, and uncompromising yet gracious Christian perspective on the most important issues concerning the truth of the Christian faith today, such as:

-the existence of God
-the meaning of life
-the objectivity of truth
-the foundation of moral values
-the creation of the universe
-intelligent design
-the reliability of the Gospels
-the uniqueness of Jesus
-the historicity of Jesus' resurrection
-the challenge of religious pluralism

We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/
Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains full-length clips: http://www.youtube.com/reasonablefait...
Follow Reasonable Faith on Twitter: http://twitter.com/rfupdates
Like Reasonable Faith on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/reasonablefai...

Jan 24, 2015

How Can Christ Be the Only Way to God?

William Lane Craig

 
A rigorous attempt to answer the problem of the fate of the unevangelized and the challenge of religious pluralism.
Introduction
 
I recently spoke at a major Canadian university on the existence of God. After my talk, one slightly irate co-ed wrote on her comment card, “I was with you until you got to the stuff about Jesus. God is not the Christian God!”

This attitude is pervasive in Western culture today. Most people are happy to agree that God exists; but in our pluralistic society it has become politically incorrect to claim that God has revealed Himself decisively in Jesus.

And yet this is exactly what the New Testament clearly teaches. Take the letters of the apostle Paul, for example. He invites his Gentile converts to recall their pre-Christian days: "Remember that at that time you were separated from Christ, aliens to the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world" (Eph 2.12). It is the burden of the opening chapters of his letter to the Romans to show that this desolate condition is the general situation of mankind. Paul explains that God’s power and deity are made known through the created order around us, so that men are without excuse (1.20), and that God has written His moral law upon all men's hearts, so that they are morally responsible before Him (2.15). Although God offers eternal life to all who will respond in an appropriate way to God's general revelation in nature and conscience (2.7), the sad fact is that rather than worship and serve their Creator, people ignore God and flout His moral law (1.21-32). The conclusion: All men are under the power of sin (3.9-12). Worse, Paul goes on to explain that no one can redeem himself by means of righteous living (3.19-20). Fortunately, however, God has provided a means of escape: Jesus Christ has died for the sins of mankind, thereby satisfying the demands of God's justice and enabling reconciliation with God (3.21-6). By means of his atoning death salvation is made available as a gift to be received by faith.
The logic of the New Testament is clear: The universality of sin and uniqueness of Christ's atoning death entail that there is no salvation apart from Christ. As the apostles proclaimed, “There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4.12).

This particularistic doctrine was just as scandalous in the polytheistic world of the Roman Empire as in contemporary Western culture. Early Christians were therefore often subjected to severe persecution, torture, and death because of their refusal to embrace a pluralistic approach to religions. In time, however, as Christianity grew to supplant the religions of Greece and Rome and became the official religion of the Roman Empire, the scandal receded. Indeed, for medieval thinkers like Augustine and Aquinas, one of the marks of the true Church was its catholicity, that is, its universality. To them it seemed incredible that the great edifice of the Christian Church, filling all of civilization, should be founded on a falsehood.

The demise of this doctrine came with the so-called “Expansion of Europe,” which refers to the three centuries of exploration and discovery from about 1450 until 1750. Through the travels and voyages of men like Marco Polo, Christopher Columbus, and Ferdinand Magellan, new civilizations and whole new worlds were discovered which knew nothing of the Christian faith. The realization that much of the world lay outside the bounds of Christianity had a two-fold impact upon people's religious thinking. First, it tended to relativize religious beliefs. It was seen that far from being the universal religion of mankind, Christianity was largely confined to Western Europe, a corner of the globe. No particular religion, it seemed, could make a claim to universal validity; each society seemed to have its own religion suited to its peculiar needs. Second, it made Christianity's claim to be the only way of salvation seem narrow and cruel. Enlightenment rationalists like Voltaire taunted the Christians of his day with the prospect of millions of Chinamen doomed to hell for not having believed in Christ, when they had not so much as even heard of Christ. In our own day, the influx into Western nations of immigrants from former colonies and the advances in telecommunications which have served to shrink the world to a global village have heightened our awareness of the religious diversity of mankind. As a result religious pluralism has today become once again the conventional wisdom.

Read more: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/how-can-christ-be-the-only-way-to-god#ixzz3PiaWCWxe

Oct 8, 2014

Apologetics Saves Lives (Literally)

The important thing here is apologetics alone, like intellect alone, without the Holy Spirit, accomplishes nothing.  But theology, apologetics, the wisdom of God along with the empowering of His Holy Spirit changes lives every day....
Apologetics (giving a rational defense of one's beliefs) is an intellectual endeavor, but the consequences can be quite practical. Since people often act on their beliefs (e.g., helping those in need because we believe that it's the right thing to do), defending true beliefs and refuting false beliefs will occasionally be a matter of life and death.

Take Oklahoma beheader Alton Nolen (who now goes by the name "Jah'Keem Yisrael") as an example.

According to Nolen's Facebook page (before it was taken down), he was raised in a Christian home:


However, as evidenced by his complete ignorance of basic Christian doctrine, he was given absolutely no intellectual foundation. When he was eventually presented with a variety of objections to Christianity in prison, he converted to Islam.

Let's look at a few of Nolen's posts to see what would have happened if he had encountered a Christian apologist.


How difficult are these objections? Watch how easy this is:

(1) Christians worship Jesus because (a) he is God; (b) he said that we must honor him just as we honor the Father (John 5:22-23), and one of the ways we honor the Father is through worship; and (c) he accepted worship from his disciples. (Click here to watch "Jesus Accepts Worship.")

(2) Christians pray in Jesus' name because he said, "Whatever you ask in my name, that will I do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son" (John 14:13). (Notice that Jesus tells his followers that he can answer their prayers.)

(3) Jesus is the Creator:
John 1:3—All things came into being through Him [Jesus], and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.

Colossians 1:16—For by Him [Jesus] all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him.
(4) Jesus is the Forgiver:
Mark 2:5-12—When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralyzed man, "Son, your sins are forgiven." Now some teachers of the law were sitting there, thinking to themselves, "Why does this fellow talk like that? He's blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?" Immediately Jesus knew in his spirit that this was what they were thinking in their hearts, and he said to them, "Why are you thinking these things? Which is easier: to say to this paralyzed man, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or to say, 'Get up, take your mat and walk'? But I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins." So he said to the man, "I tell you, get up, take your mat and go home." He got up, took his mat and walked out in full view of them all. This amazed everyone and they praised God, saying, "We have never seen anything like this!"

Read the rest of this article at -  http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2014/10/apologetics-saves-lives-literally.html

Sep 6, 2014

Why Must the Cause of the Universe Be Personal and Not Impersonal?



For more resources visit: http://www.reasonablefaith.org

In 2011 Dr William Lane Craig spoke at the Forum of Christian Leaders (FOCL) in Hungary. While they he spoke on the topic, "Five Arguments for Theism" and took questions from the audience to accompany his lecture. This video is from an interview in which Dr Craig addresses different questions.

We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/

Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel: http://www.youtube.com/reasonablefait...

Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: http://twitter.com/rfupdates

Add Reasonable Faith On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/reasonablefai...

Jun 12, 2014

Philosophy Phoenix Arises to Annihilate deGrasse Tyson

Disagree with Tyson? Racist!
Disagree with Tyson? Racist!


Or, Gödel Versus the New World Order
By: Jay

In the land of the blind, the 80s black science guy with 80s black guy mustache is king.  In a recent interview, high priest of neo-Darwinian scientism, Neil de Grasse Tyson expounded the true profundity of his worldview.  Tyson stated on a recent podcast:
“interviewer: At a certain point it’s just futile.

dGT: Yeah, yeah, exactly, exactly. My concern here is that the philosophers believe they are actually asking deep questions about nature. And to the scientist it’s, what are you doing? Why are you concerning yourself with the meaning of meaning?
(another) interviewer: I think a healthy balance of both is good.

dGT: Well, I’m still worried even about a healthy balance. Yeah, if you are distracted by your questions so that you can’t move forward, you are not being a productive contributor to our understanding of the natural world. And so the scientist knows when the question “what is the sound of one hand clapping?” is a pointless delay in our progress.
[insert predictable joke by one interviewer, imitating the clapping of one hand]

dGT: How do you define clapping? All of a sudden it devolves into a discussion of the definition of words. And I’d rather keep the conversation about ideas. And when you do that don’t derail yourself on questions that you think are important because philosophy class tells you this. The scientist says look, I got all this world of unknown out there, I’m moving on, I’m leaving you behind. You can’t even cross the street because you are distracted by what you are sure are deep questions you’ve asked yourself. I don’t have the time for that. [Note to the reader: I, like Neil, live and work in Manhattan, and I can assure you that I am quite adept at crossing the perilous streets of the metropolis.]

interviewer [not one to put too fine a point on things, apparently]: I also felt that it was a fat load of crap, as one could define what crap is and the essential qualities that make up crap: how you grade a philosophy paper? [5]

dGT [laughing]: Of course I think we all agree you turned out okay.
interviewer: Philosophy was a good Major for comedy, I think, because it does get you to ask a lot of ridiculous questions about things.

dGT: No, you need people to laugh at your ridiculous questions.
interviewers: It’s a bottomless pit. It just becomes nihilism.

dGT: nihilism is a kind of philosophy”

This is so ridiculous, I am at a loss as to where to begin.  Tyson represents the latest, popular PR front man for the New Atheist club that have taken the Internet, bookstores, sub reddits and mama’s basement-bound neckbeards by storm.  Before launching into this, I would like to remind readers that just as the media’s fixation and focus on planned events is engineered, so is the obsession and worship of these faces of so-called science.  These “scientists” are given to you as men to follow and look up to, when they are utter and complete fools. Let’s unpack this.

Tyson’s statements are ahistorical beyond belief.  Like any discipline, philosophy is a broad subject that encompasses all kinds of associations and related fields.  Philosophy relates to mathematics, in number theory.  Philosophy relates to technology, insofar as computer technology emerges from the philosophical presuppositions of Leibniz.  Philosophy relates to modern scientific methodology, as modern science originated from philosophers.  Aristotle, the father of science, was a philosopher.  Logic, which is the science of argumentation is philosophy.  Logic directly relates to mathematics and math theory.  Tyson uses words, and words are part of a linguistic web, which is philosophy.  Philosophy of science is an entire sub discipline, but the New Atheists have spoken from Olympus on that, too, as Feynman famously said: “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.”
It's so liberal and sciencey!
It’s so liberal and sciencey!
 
Have these men ever taken a philosophy class?  Surely they were required to study basic logic in their undergraduate program, do they not recall the connection and association of logic with the mathematics they use in their physics?  That these so-called academics can make such ignorant, untrue statements suggests they are not all they appear to be – they are actually con men for a longtime British Royal Society and Oxford Inner Party plan to implement mass atheistic socialism and idiocy.  Lest you doubt me on that claim, you will find it openly in the writings of Bertrand Russell in works like The Impact of Science on Society, C.G. Darwin’s The Next Million Years, Koestler’s Ghost in the Machine, the works of H.G. Wells, and a thousand other technocrats openly proclaim their “final revolution” to establish a world government.  And it’s not accidental these devils rise from the Satanic smoke of England.

Read the full article at - http://jaysanalysis.com/2014/06/10/philosophy-phoenix-arises-to-annihilate-degrasse-tyson/#more-5259

Dec 12, 2013

Does Micah 5:2 predict that Jesus would be the Messiah?

 


by Ryan Turner

The Historical and Literary Context

Micah was a contemporary of the prophet Isaiah who lived in the 8th century B.C.  In this short passage, he predicts that the Messiah will be born in the Bethlehem of David.[1]  Micah presents the idea of a coming ruler against the backdrop of the invasion of Judah by the Babylonians.  This text was intended to bring comfort to the despairing covenant people.  In contrast to a smitten king (5:1), a great ruler (5:2) would come to shepherd God’s people.

The Prophecy

But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of you shall come forth to Me the One to be Ruler in Israel, whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting (Micah 5:2).

Interpretation

There are a number of important aspects of this text.  First, Ephrathah is simply the older form of Bethlehem in this passage (cf. Genesis 35:16, 19; 48:7).[2]  Second, linguistically a case can be made for showing a strong affinity between this figure and God.  Qedem, the Hebrew word for old, means from “ancient times” and it is used of God Himself elsewhere in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 33:27; Habakkuk 1:12).  Further, mee mai-oulom literally means from “ancient time or eternity.”[3]  One can also translate it as “days of immeasurable time.”[4]  Robert Jamieson notes, “The terms convey the strongest assertion of infinite duration of which the Hebrew language is capable.”[5]  There are other references in Scripture where this phraseology is used, as in Psalm 90:2 where the reference is to God the Father and in Proverbs 8:22-23 where the voice of Wisdom speaks.  “Old” and “ancient times” can refer to eternity.  The Hebrew word for ancient times is used in Micah 4:7 to refer to God.  Ankerberg, Weldon, and Kaiser point out, “The fact that such terms were used of a future ruler indicates that Micah expected a supernatural figure. This harmonizes with Isaiah’s expectation of the Messiah in Isaiah 9:6 where the future Messianic King is called ‘eternal’ and ‘God’ (El), a word Isaiah uses only of God.”[6]
Third, this passage was recognized by the Jews as a Messianic text, especially in all of the Jewish paraphrases and interpretations of the Old Testament known as Targums.[7]  The Aramaic Targum Jonathan translates as “. . . out of thee shall proceed in my presence the Messiah to exercise sovereignty over Israel; whose name has been called from eternity, from the days of the everlasting.”[8]  Likewise, the priests and scribes during Herod’s day likewise thought that it was Messianic (Matthew 2:5-6; John 7:42).  Fruchtenbaum summarizes the text well, “Here in Micah 5:2, we read where that birth is to take place. Messiah is to be born, not in Jerusalem as might have been expected, but in Bethlehem.”[9]

Evaluation as an Apologetic Argument

This text definitely is a valid text to use in demonstrating the case for Jesus as Messiah.  While it is difficult to demonstrate that Micah predicted the incarnation of God in the flesh, the text at least demonstrates where the Messiah would be born.  As such, one must be careful to take all of the factors into consideration when arguing for the deity of Christ from this passage.  Anyhow, one can at least argue that the text comes extremely close to demonstrating that the Messiah would be eternal – using phraseology that is only used of God.  Therefore, one is definitely justified in using this text to argue that Jesus is the Messiah.
[1] Louis Goldberg, Our Jewish Friends, Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers, 1983, p. 123.
[2] John A. Martin, “Micah,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures, eds. John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck, Wheaton: Victor Books, 1983, p. 1486.
[3] John Ankerberg, John Weldon, and Walter C. Kaiser, The Case for Jesus the Messiah: Incredible Prophecies that Prove God Exists, Chattanooga: The John Ankerberg Evangelistic Association, 1989, p. 74.
[4] Martin, “Micah,” p. 1486.
[5] Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown, A Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments, Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997.
[6] Ankerberg, Weldon, and Kaiser, p. 75.
[7] Kenneth L. Barker, Micah (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2001), p. 86.
[8] Ankerberg, Weldon, and Kaiser, p. 75-76.
[9] Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, Messianic Christology: A Study of Old Testament Prophecy Concerning the First Coming of the Messiah, Tustin, CA: Ariel Ministries, 1998., p. 64.

Read the full article at - http://carm.org/does-micah-5-2-predict-jesus-messiah

Dec 11, 2013

Has The Bible Been Changed?

More good research from Chris White, explaining why the Bible is such a reliable (living) document.  Good stuff...


Can You Trust the Bible Historically? - Is it a Game of Telephone? - What about the Gnostic Gospels?

From Chris White http://chriswhiteministries.com

The questions Im going to look at today are:

Can we trust the New Testament as a historical document?
Hasn't the Bible been rewritten so many times that it can't be trusted?
Wasn't the New Testament written hundreds of years after Christ?
*Was the bible changed?

Clip from http://www.100huntley.com/ used with written permission

Nov 12, 2013

Why do the good suffer?



How Can We Demonstrate that Objective Moral Values Exist to a Nihilist Who Holds They are Illusory

A little high end apologetics with Dr. Lane Craig...


For more resources visit: http://www.reasonablefaith.org

The Bethinking National Apologetics Day Conference: "Countering the New Atheism" took place during the UK Reasonable Faith Tour in October 2011. Christian academics William Lane Craig, John Lennox, Peter J Williams and Gary Habermas lead 600 people in training on how to defend and proclaim the credibility of Christianity against the growing tide of secularism and New Atheist popular thought in western society.

In this session, William Lane Craig delivers his critique of Richard Dawkins' objections to arguments for the existence of God, followed by questions and answers from the audience. In this clip, Dr Craig addresses a question about how objective moral values can be demonstrated to a Nihilist, who hold that they are illusory.

To watch the full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm0hI...

We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/

Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel: http://www.youtube.com/drcraigvideos

Follow Reasonable Faith on Twitter: http://twitter.com/rfupdates

Add Reasonable Faith on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/reasonablefai...

Aug 16, 2013

Monumental Foolishness in a Foolish Monument

 


By    
monumental1
Discerning latter-day prophetic fulfillment arises in at least two ways. One is from watching the development of the geographic and socioeconomic conditions described in Scripture for the latter days. In this arena, Israel and the Middle East stand front and center. The other comes through careful observation of spiritual decline, also prophesied for the period of Christ’s return for the church.
On the latter count, a recent Associated Press news release gives us great insight into the current times and seasons. It was datelined Starke, Florida, June 30th, 2013:

“A group of atheists unveiled a monument to their nonbelief in God on Saturday [June 29th] to sit alongside a granite slab that lists the Ten Commandments in front of the Bradford County courthouse.

“As a small group of protesters blasted Christian country music and waved ‘Honk for Jesus’ signs, the atheists celebrated what they believe is the first atheist monument allowed on government property in the United States.

“‘When you look at this monument, the first thing you will notice is that it has a function. Atheists are about the real and the physical, so we elected to place this monument in the form of a bench,’ said David Silverman, president of American Atheists.”

Notice that he presents atheism as a system based upon the observable, the pragmatic and the functional. By definition, atheists do not believe in God. To believe is to have faith, and they are without faith. Their practice is built upon things accomplished. Emblazoned upon one end of the 1,500-pound stone bench is a quote from American Atheists founder Madelyn Murray O’Hair:
“An atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An atheist believes that deed must be done instead of prayer. An atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty banished, war eliminated.”

Certainly, there is nothing wrong with doing good, but believing that it will improve humanity is the ultimate folly. The Apostle Paul, writing to the Ephesian Christians, refers to their former lives, prior to salvation:

“12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world” (Eph. 2:12).
Here, the phrase “without God” comes from the Greek atheos, the very word that comes into the English language as “atheist.” The Greek word for God is preceded by the letter alpha. Scholars call it the “alpha privative.” When attached to the beginning of the word, it means “no God,” or “without God.”

In practical terms, it argues against the acknowledgment of God, who has existed since time immemorial. As we often say, “If there were no God, you couldn’t be an atheist.” That is, an atheist needs a God to argue against. Atheists profess that they would be perfectly content without a god of any sort. In that hypothetical case – if God actually didn’t exist – there could be no working concept of theism, so the unbeliever would have nothing to oppose.

One might argue that in that case, the concept of a god would have been invented, but that seems a vain hypothesis, because in fact, the existence of God has long been both believed and documented. Holy Scripture has more manuscript evidence than any other existing historical document.
It appears then, that those calling themselves atheists must have the active desire to disprove Scriptural history and truth, along with its central assertion that God exists and interacts with mankind.

King David put it bluntly:

“1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. 2 The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. 3 They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one. 4 Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD. 5 There were they in great fear: for God is in the generation of the righteous. 6 Ye have shamed the counsel of the poor, because the LORD is his refuge. 7 Oh that the salvation of Israel were come out of Zion! when the LORD bringeth back the captivity of his people, Jacob shall rejoice, and Israel shall be glad.” (Psalm 14: 1-7).

The God of Prophecy

In this Psalm, we find a great truth. God not only exists, but His existence has a purpose … to clean up a morally despicable earthly population and produce a righteous generation. And beyond that, He desires to save the world through a restored Zion … His Kingdom on Earth.

Furthermore, He links His work to the return of the Jews to their homeland, something we have witnessed in our lifetimes. For the believers of our generation, Scripture isn’t theoretical, it’s a living reality, witnessed in the daily developments of our world.

From the Scriptural view, the essence of truth is to be found only through our Lord, His Apostles and His prophets. The ability to perceive His truth is not found by unrighteous men – men who have not received the gift of salvation and the accompanying ability to understand spiritual things. Without the truth, they apply human “wisdom,” resulting in the parade of shame that can be seen every day on the news.

Despite their desire to create an improved society, the world of non-believers is increasingly chaotic and dangerous. Without the proper spiritual connection with God, “doing good” is a practical impossibility.

The Apostle Paul put it quite plainly, in unmistakable language:

“12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual 14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. 16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ” (1 Cor. 2:12-16).

Common Sense

It is this “mind of Christ” that we have taken for granted in a land that was, from its earliest beginnings, guided by Christian men. Our Founding Fathers, Christian political leaders, missionaries, businessmen, circuit-riding preachers on the old frontier and the traditional churches “on every street corner,” brought God’s blessing. Our culture developed beneath a canopy of protection, as the ubiquitous Spirit of God was spread abroad by a societal majority of Christian faith. Not that we were perfect; we were protected. No doubt, the minions of Satan found it difficult to operate in a land where God’s Spirit was so infused into the common way of life.

A lamentable internal Civil War, a Great Depression and two World Wars failed to crush our rising tide of prosperity and plenty. U.S. missions and charities were unique in the world. CARE packages fed the poor and hungry of every country, even those of the enemy. We were (and still are) known for our charity, though it appears that even this quality is starting to falter, being replaced by government handouts.

We have always been blessed by the presence of God’s Holy Spirit. A Christian ethos flowed through our land like a warm spring breeze. It may truly be said that the “mind of Christ” created what came to be known as “the American dream.” For nearly two centuries, its influence produced what we call “common sense.” It expressed itself as Yankee ingenuity, a “can-do” spirit and smiling neighborliness. America was the fountainhead of invention.

Sadly, we began to take our exceptional qualities for granted. After the return of the last Astronaut from the Moon, we turned inward, to satiate the lusts of the good life. As is always the case, plenty produces apathy, and the assumption that there will always be an excess of bounty.

In the closing decades of the twentieth century, godless men came to power in increasing numbers. More often than not, they ran for office on the aura of Christian belief. It became an obligation to pose for a photograph on the steps of a respected community church, holding high the traditional ten-pound Bible.
After all, most of the voters were church-going people.

Now, in the twenty-first century, we seem about to give up even the pretense of Christian faith. Atheists are encouraged to step out boldly to proclaim their independence.

Judicial Blindness

Atheism is nothing new. As it addresses human history, the Bible is a sad recounting of serial failure on a national and international scale. Gentile powers range across four chaotic empires, which in the end rise to despotic power, only to be completely crushed. The Kingdom of Israel is broken into the Northern and Southern Kingdoms, both of which are finally destroyed, their refugee citizens dispersed to every country on Earth.

We see this pattern because it is in the human character and nature to worship its own, human ideas. Thousands of philosophers, seeking “truth,” end up following their own lusts. Seeking enlightenment, they wander in darkness. Groping for sight and insight, they end up in a deeper state of blindness than when they started.

Israel is the number-one example of this phenomenon. In the first century, under the combined reigns of the Caesars and the Herods, religious Jews longed for the coming of their Messiah. In addition to the prophecies of the Old Testament, they had their Talmudic traditions and rabbinic commentaries about how to predict His coming, and how to recognize Him when He came.

Above all, they spoke of the signs that would manifest themselves in the presence of the true Messiah. They were three in number:

First, He would be able to cleanse the leper. Scripture tells us it happened:

“1 When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him. 2 And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. 3 And Jesus put forth his hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed” (Matt. 8:1-3).

Second, He would cast out the dumb demon, as is given in this well-known passage:

“32 As they went out, behold, they brought to him a dumb man possessed with a devil. 33 And when the devil was cast out, the dumb spake: and the multitudes marvelled, saying, It was never so seen in Israel” (Matt. 9:32,33).

Third, He would restore sight to the man born blind, phenomenally described by the Apostle John:
“1 And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth. 2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind? 3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him. 4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work. 5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world. 6 When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay, 7 And said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, (which is by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing” (John 9:1-7).

The Bible states that Jesus fulfilled these signs more than once. Early in the Gospels, He began His ministry by fulfilling them specifically. Yet the spiritual leaders of Israel pressed Him for a sign:
“38 Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. 39 But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: 40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” (Matt. 12:38-40).

Here, we have the ludicrous picture of Israel’s leading spiritual authorities testing the man who had already given them the three signs they expected. Yet, they demanded another one. His answer to them offers us the classic definition of what has come to be called, “judicial blindness.”

Its premise is quite simple. When someone refuses to acknowledge what God has made visible to them, He will remove even the limited sight that they had to begin with. His judgment takes away even their partial vision. In the end, they are rendered completely blind. In extreme cases, they will become professing atheists.

Many Jews have fallen into the trap of non-belief. Among the most famous are the seventeenth-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza, German psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, scientific socialist Karl Marx and physicist Carl Sagan. There are thousands of others like them.

At the beginning of His public ministry, Jesus spoke plainly and openly. After the Pharisees began to attribute His miracles to Beelzebub, He began to speak in obscure language. His disciples asked Him about it:

“10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given” (Matt. 13:10,11).

In the end, the Pharisees were completely deprived of His truth, and reduced to total blindness. In the 23rd chapter of Matthew, in a final declaration, Jesus pronounces eight woes upon them. Five times in the same chapter, He refers to them as “blind.” The chapter ends with a prophecy of their final doom:

“29 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord” (Matt. 23:29).

The Jews should have known enough to greet Him with the traditional Messianic greeting, but they did not. One day, they will be given another chance.
monumental2

Gentile Blindness

Gentiles, on the other hand, have consistently refused to attribute the wonders of the natural world to God’s creative power. They should have been able to recognize that the creation could not have come into being by itself. Instead, they concocted theories about how it spontaneously erupted through its own chemistry and will. Then they raised their hypotheses to a high art.

Strange varieties of nature worship, depicted in the antics of thousands of created gods were their “science.”

Because of that, God took what little insight they had, and reduced it to nothing. The following classic passage chronicles man’s descent into spiritual blindness:

“21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves” (Rom. 1:21-24).

Man’s descent into spiritual blindness always results in the same social phenomenon. When spiritual sense disappears, common sense quickly follows. As common sense begins to wane, we discover that it is not so common, after all.

The evidence of God is everywhere. Sadly, denial of Him is on the rise. Atheism is now proclaimed with pride.

Mar 4, 2013

Who Killed Muhammad?

Interesting stuff from the Koran on who killed Muhammad, how, and perhaps even why.  Was Muhammad a false prophet?  You decide.  The dead prophet of Islam is no match for the living Son of God seated at the right hand of God the Father.  (Acts 5:31, Hebrews 10:12)

Feb 17, 2013

Chopping Down Muslim Apologetics

Here they are refuting renowned Muslim apologeticist Shabir Ally, and quite embarrassingly, it's not difficult.  Islam does a good job of standing on emotional grounds, as it appeals to arabs at least, but it's indefensible against Christianity which came before it, and offers the Savior (Jesus Christ) and mercy (through God the Father, YAHWEH) that Islam can never provide.

 

Feb 14, 2013

Favourite Quotes Advocating Faith in the God Who Rules over All Heaven and Earth

favourite quotes

I realize that a few sites, such as Stumbleupon are linking directly to the 'favourite quotes' page without going through the proof. Please do enjoy the quotes, and feel free to e-mail me with some that you may like, but please also take the time to go through the proof by clicking 'The Proof' tab at the column on the left. Thanks For the heresy hunters I in no way endorse the views of anyone quoted on this page. Some I agree with, and some I do not, but I trust that those reading these quotes are intelligent enough not to accept all of what a person says just because they may have one or two good quotes. Test everything with Scripture (1 Thess. 5:21).


A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell.C.S. Lewis
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened. Winston Churchill

The loneliest moment in life is when you have just experienced that which you thought would deliver the ultimate, and it has just let you down.Ravi Zacharias

I do not feel obliged to believe that same God who endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect had intended for us to forgo their use.Galileo

The atheist can't find God for the same reason that a thief can't find a policeman.Author Unknown
The worst moment for the atheist is when he is really thankful, and has nobody to thank.Dante Gabriel Rossetti


Humanism or atheism is a wonderful philosophy of life as long as you are big, strong, and between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five. But watch out if you are in a lifeboat and there are others who are younger, bigger, or smarter.William Murray
Absent an absolute moral authority independent of fallible humans, the only meaning “wrong” could have (pertaining to conduct) would be “in opposition to X,” or “falling short of X’s standards,” which are only persuasive to those who have already accepted X.Calvin Freiburger
The real attitude of sin in the heart towards God is that of being without God; it is pride, the worship of myself, that is the great atheistic fact in human life.Oswald Chambers
The theory that thought is merely a movement in the brain is, in my opinion, nonsense; for if so, that theory itself would be merely a movement, an event among atoms, which may have speed and direction but of which it would be meaningless to use the words 'true' or 'false'.C.S. Lewis
If there is no God, then all that exists is time and chance acting on matter. If this is true then the difference between your thoughts and mine correspond to the difference between shaking up a bottle of Mountain Dew and a bottle of Dr. Pepper. You simply fizz atheistically and I fizz theistically. This means that you do not hold to atheism because it is true , but rather because of a series of chemical reactionsÂ… Â… Morality, tragedy, and sorrow are equally evanescent. They are all empty sensations created by the chemical reactions of the brain, in turn created by too much pizza the night before. If there is no God, then all abstractions are chemical epiphenomena, like swamp gas over fetid water. This means that we have no reason for assigning truth and falsity to the chemical fizz we call reasoning or right and wrong to the irrational reaction we call morality. If no God, mankind is a set of bi-pedal carbon units of mostly water. And nothing else.
Douglas Wilson

The atheist can appeal to nothing absolute, nothing objectively true for all people, it is just mere opinion enforced by might. The Christian appeals to a standard outside himself/herself in which truth and qualitative values can be made sense of.
Peter Huff

My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such a violent reaction against it?... Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if i did that, then my argument against God collapsed too--for the argument depended on saying the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies. Thus, in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist - in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless - I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality - namely my idea of justice - was full of sense. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never have known it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.C.S. Lewis

Science can tell us how to do many things, but it can not tell us what ought to be done.Author Unknown

If God would concede me His omnipotence for 24 hours, you would see how many changes I would make in the world. But if He gave me His wisdom too, I would leave things as they are.J.M.L. Monsabre

If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too. If so, then all our present thoughts are mere accidents - the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms. And this holds for the thoughts of the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else's. But if their thoughts - i.e., Materialism and Astronomy - are mere accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be true? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give me a correct account of all the other accidents. It's like expecting the accidental shape taken by the splash when you upset a milk-jug should give you a correct account of how the jug was made and why it was upset.C.S. Lewis

Man is certainly crazy. He could not make a mite, and he makes gods by the dozen.Michel De Montaigne, Essays

The greatest act of faith takes place when a man finally decides that he is not God.Johann Wolfgang Goethe

There are those who hate Christianity and call their hatred an all-embracing love for all religions.G.K. Chesterton

Practicing psychiatry without faith in God is like meeting a hungry man and giving him a toothpick.Author Unknown

We must live with people to know their problems and live with God to 'help' solve them.Author Unknown

Men do not differ much about what things they will call evils; they differ enormously about what evils they will call excusable.G.K. Chesterton

A great many of those who 'debunk' traditional...values have in the background values of their own which they believe to be immune from the debunking process.C.S. Lewis
Aim at heaven and you will get earth thrown in. Aim at earth and you get neither.C.S. Lewis
There are two different kinds of revelation, natural revelation, which we find in the world, and special revelation, which we find in the word of God. A basic rule of Biblical interpretation is that we should always interpret natural revelation through the grid of special revelation, that is the word of God. We don't look at the world and then say this is truth, therefore we must conform the Scriptures to what we see. This view is a deadly mistake and would lead to atheism. I interpret science through the lens of the word of God, which presupposes the truth of Genesis 1-3. There is no evidence of higher value or authority than the word of God.Gene Cook

The traditional form of arguing for God's existence allows for the participants in the debate to stand on the sidelines, like two opposing coaches, in order to look at how their respective teams are doing out on the field. A distinction is maintained at all times between the participants on the field and the spectators along the sidelines. But a transcendental argument, on the other hand, is all-inclusive. A common mistake among those not familiar with this form of argumentation is to assume that it is the same kind of argument as one of the more traditional arguments. This in turn leads to misunderstandings and loud complaints when the transcendental players proceed to tackle the coach, water boy, trainer, and ESPN cameramen.Douglas Wilson


If you board the wrong train, it is no use running along the corridor in the other direction.Dietrich Bonhoeffer

I believe in Christianity as I believe that the Sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.C.S. Lewis

Some people complain because God puts thorns on roses, while others praise God for putting roses among thorns.Author Unknown

A heathen philosopher once asked a Christian, 'Where is God'? The Christian answered, 'Let me first ask you, Where is He not?'Aaron Arrowsmith

I was at this time of living, like so many Atheists or Anti-theists, in a whirl of contradictions. I maintained that God did not exist. I was also very angry with God for not existing. I was equally angry with Him for creating a world.C.S. Lewis

No philosophical theory which I have yet come across is a radical improvement on the words of Genesis, that 'In the beginning God made Heaven and Earth'.C.S. Lewis
There is no neutral ground in the universe: every square inch, every split second, is claimed by God and counterclaimed by Satan.C.S. Lewis

Whatsoever is good for God's children they shall have it, for all is theirs to further them to heaven; therefore, if poverty be good, they shall have it; if disgrace be good, they shall have it; if crosses be good, they shall have them; if misery be good, they shall have it; for all is ours, to serve for our greatest good.Richard Sibbes


For when we cease to worship God, we do not worship nothing, we worship anything.G. K. Chesterton

How often we look upon God as our last and feeblest resource! We go to him because we have nowhere else to go. And then we learn that the storms of life have driven us, not upon the rocks, but into the desired haven.George Macdonald

Someone once said that if you sat a million monkeys at a million typewriters for a million years, one of them would eventually type out all of Hamlet by chance. But when we find the text of Hamlet, we don't wonder whether it came from chance and monkeys. Why then does the atheist use that incredibly improbable explanation for the universe? Clearly, because it is his only chance of remaining an atheist. At this point we need a psychological explanation of the atheist rather than a logical explanation of the universe.Peter Kreeft

A silly idea is current that good people do not know what temptation means. This is an obvious lie. Only those who try to resist temptation know how strong it is... A man who gives in to temptation after five minutes simply does not know what it would have been like an hour later. That is why bad people, in one sense, know very little about badness. They have lived a sheltered life by always giving in.C. S. Lewis

Prayer is not overcoming God's reluctance, but laying hold of His willingness.Martin Luther
If God were small enough to be understood, He would not be big enough to be worshiped.Evelyn Underhill

An utterly fascinating illustration of this duping of ourselves is the latest arts building opened at Ohio State University, the Wexner Center for the Performing Arts, another one of our chimerical exploits in the name of intellectual advance. Newsweek branded this building "America's first deconstructionist building." It's white scaffolding, red brick turrets, and Colorado grass pods evoke a double take. But puzzlement only intensifies when you enter the building, for inside you encounter stairways that go nowhere, pillars that hang from the ceiling without purpose, and angled surfaces configured to create a sense of vertigo. The architect, we are duly informed, designed this building to reflect life itself-senseless and incoherent-and the "capriciousness of the rules that organize the built world." When the rationale was explained to me, I had just one question: Did he do the same with the foundation?

The laughter in response to my question unmasked the double standard our deconstructionists espouse. And that is precisely the double standard of atheism! It is possible to dress up and romanticize our bizarre experiments in social restructuring while disavowing truth or absolutes. But one dares not play such deadly games with the foundations of good thinking.Ravi Zacharias
There are no ordinary people.. it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub, and

exploit.C.S. Lewis

Out of 100 men, one will read the Bible, the other 99 will read the Christian.D.L. Moody
The secret formula of the saints: When I am in the cellar of affliction, I look for the Lord's choicest wines.Samuel Rutherford

It is our wisest and our safest course to stand at the farthest distance from sin; not to go near the house of the harlot, but to fly from all appearance of evil (Prov. 5:8, I Thess. 5:22). The best course to prevent falling into the pit is to keep at the greatest distance; he that will be so bold as to attempt to dance upon the brink of the pit, may find by woeful experience that it is a righteous thing with God that he should fall into the pit.Thomas Brooks

The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried.G.K. Chesterton

If you ask why we should obey God, in the last resort the answer is, 'I am.'

To know God is to know that our obedience is due to Him.C.S. Lewis

God exist whether or not men may choose to believe in Him. The reason why many people do not believe in God is not so much that it is intellectually impossible to believe in God, but because belief in God forces that thoughtful person to face the fact that he is accountable to such a God. Robert A. Laidlaw

Occam's razor states that one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything, however, the simple theory must be able to account for or explain what needs explaining. It's not enough to have a simpler theory if you can't account for anything. Though we shouldn't add entities beyond what's needed, we also should not subtract entities beyond what's needed. Paul Manata

Atheism is a crutch for those who cannot bear the reality of God.Tom Stoppard

Still, even the most admirable of atheists is nothing more than a moral parasite, living his life based on borrowed ethics. This is why, when pressed, the atheist will often attempt to hide his lack of conviction in his own beliefs behind some poorly formulated utilitarianism, or argue that he acts out of altruistic self-interest. But this is only post-facto rationalization, not reason or rational behavior.Vox Day

Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.Heywood Broun
Merely having an open mind is nothing; the object of opening a mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid. G.K. Chesterton

The most valued attributes of mankind do not come naturally to the human animal; character borrows from the divine. A.S.A. Jones

What comes into our minds when we think about God, is the most important thing about us. A.W. Tozer

Read more at - http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/favourite-quotes.php