Obama will go 2 for 2 on inauguration swearing in ceremonies. That is, the nation at large will not have heard either his first or last (?) swearing-in, because both, for the first time ever, will have been done in private. Which begs the question, what is he actually swearing an oath to? To the Constitution? To the people? To a god of his choosing? Who knows? Because we won't hear it. Hasn't the White House ever heard of camera phones? C'mon man. This is too bizarre. By the way, Justice Roberts, who re-administered the oath (whatever the oath was) the first time is the same Justice Roberts who mysteriously changed his stated opinions and voted for "Obamacare", then left the country for a "much-needed" vacation in Europe. Go figure.
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
One month from now on January 20, 2013, President Obama will be required by law to be sworn-in for his second presidential term by noon. However, something mysterious is happening again with the ceremony raising the eyebrows of some.
Since the 20th falls on a Sunday, a private ceremony will be held signifying the possibility of fraud as the “public” ceremony will be held the following day.
The fact is that even a deviation by even one single word during the ceremony (as admitted by Chief Justice Roberts in 2009) could signify an unlawful and unconstitutional swear-in as we saw four years ago at the public ceremony. Shortly after another “private” ceremony was held which caused quite a controversy at the time. Some speculate that the administration was hiding something as an executive order was signed by President Obama shortly after hiding all his records and possibly CIA activity.
The Washington Times reported on January 21, 2009 that, “President Obama took the oath of office a second time Wednesday night during a private ceremony at the White House, one day after the flubbing of the oath on Inauguration Day”….“We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of an abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time.”
Read more at - http://theintelhub.com/2012/11/21/obama-to-hold-private-swear-in-ceremony-for-second-presidential-term/
By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
One month from now on January 20, 2013, President Obama will be required by law to be sworn-in for his second presidential term by noon. However, something mysterious is happening again with the ceremony raising the eyebrows of some.
Since the 20th falls on a Sunday, a private ceremony will be held signifying the possibility of fraud as the “public” ceremony will be held the following day.
The fact is that even a deviation by even one single word during the ceremony (as admitted by Chief Justice Roberts in 2009) could signify an unlawful and unconstitutional swear-in as we saw four years ago at the public ceremony. Shortly after another “private” ceremony was held which caused quite a controversy at the time. Some speculate that the administration was hiding something as an executive order was signed by President Obama shortly after hiding all his records and possibly CIA activity.
The Washington Times reported on January 21, 2009 that, “President Obama took the oath of office a second time Wednesday night during a private ceremony at the White House, one day after the flubbing of the oath on Inauguration Day”….“We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of an abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time.”
Read more at - http://theintelhub.com/2012/11/21/obama-to-hold-private-swear-in-ceremony-for-second-presidential-term/
